California Appellate Tracker

Jacqueline B. v. Rawls Law Grp., P.C., No. B308815, 2021 Cal. App. LEXIS 705 (Ct. App. Aug. 26, 2021)

August 31, 2021

California could not exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a Virginia law firm and its lawyers. The lawyers had done nothing to avail themselves of California’s benefits. They had a website with minimum interactivity not directed to California residents in particular but rather to veterans throughout the country. The lawyers had Virginia bar licenses, not California ones. Though plaintiff (their client) was a California resident when she contacted the lawyers and signed their retainer agreement, she moved out of state during the time the lawyers negotiated a settlement on her behalf with the Veterans Administration through that agency’s Arizona lawyers. Furthermore, plaintiff’s malpractice claim was not related to the lawyers’ California contacts. The malpractice was allegedly in negotiating and urging plaintiff to accept the settlement, which the lawyers had negotiated from Virginia with the Veterans Administration lawyers in Arizona while plaintiff was living outside California.

Subscribe to California Appellate Tracker

Thank you for your desire to subscribe to Severson & Werson’s Appellate Tracker Weblog. In order to subscribe, you must provide a valid name and e-mail address. This too will be retained on our server. When you push the “subscribe button”, we will send an electronic mail to the address that you provided asking you to confirm your subscription to our Weblog. By pushing the “subscribe button”, you represent and warrant that you are over the age of 18 years old, are the owner/authorized user of that e-mail address, and are entitled to receive e-mails at that address. Our weblog will retain your name and e-mail address on its server, or the server of its web host. However, we won’t share any of this information with anyone except the Firm’s employees and contractors, except under certain extraordinary circumstances described on our Privacy Policy and (About The Consumer Finance Blog/About the Appellate Tracker Weblog) Page. NOTICE AND AGREEMENT REGARDING E-MAILS AND CALLS/TEXT MESSAGES TO LAND-LINE AND WIRELESS TELEPHONES: By providing your contact information and confirming your subscription in response to the initial e-mail that we send you, you agree to receive e-mail messages from Severson & Werson from time-to-time and understand and agree that such messages are or may be sent by means of automated dialing technology. If you have your email forwarded to other electronic media, including text messages and cellular telephone by way of VoIP, internet, social media, or otherwise, you agree to receive my messages in that way. This may result in charges to you. Your agreement and consent also extend to any other agents, affiliates, or entities to whom our communications are forwarded. You agree that you will notify Severson & Werson in writing if you revoke this agreement and that your revocation will not be effective until you notify Severson & Werson in writing. You understand and agree that you will afford Severson & Werson a reasonable time to unsubscribe you from the website, that the ability to do so depends on Severson & Werson’s press of business and access to the weblog, and that you may still receive one or more emails or communications from weblog until we are able to unsubscribe you.

I Agree

Effective, Experienced, Exceptional.

California Appellate Tracker

Jacqueline B. v. Rawls Law Grp., P.C., No. B308815, 2021 Cal. App. LEXIS 705 (Ct. App. Aug. 26, 2021)

Categories

San Francisco

Severson & Werson

Orange County

Severson & Werson