The insured landlord’s CGL policy excluded claims for claims arising out of actual or claimed uninhabitable conditions on the premises–and all other claims (whether or not otherwise covered) which were alleged in the same suit as claims for non-habitability. This decision holds that the exclusion was plain, clear, conspicuous, and enforceable. As a result, the exclusion relieved the insurer of any duty to indemnify or defend the two non-habitability claims in this case as well as the 11 habitability claims. As none of the claims were even potentially covered, Buss v. Superior Court (1997) 16 Cal.4th 35 did not come into play, as this was not a mixed action containing some covered claims.