(Under FRCivP 4(k)(2), a federal court may exercise jurisdiction over a foreign defendant on a federal claim if the defendant is not subject to personal jurisdiction in any state’s courts and exercising jurisdiction over the defendant comports with due process considering his contacts with the US as a whole. Here, the district court could properly exercise jurisdiction over the foreign operator of a website that allegedly infringed copyright. Under the Calder “effects” test, the operator purposefully directed its activities to the US and expressly aimed its activities at the US by choosing an English name for the website, hosting the website in Utah, and buying services that allowed the website to load faster in the US than would otherwise be true. Plaintiff was foreseeably injured in the US by the 1.3 million visits to defendant’s website in the US over the prior 3 years.)