The trial court correctly denied the defendant employer’s motion to compel arbitration. The arbitration agreement did not clearly delegate the decision on unconscionability to the arbitrator. Merely referring to “arbitrability” as a kind of dispute handled by the arbitrator was insufficient, as was incorporation of AAA rules, at least in the context of an employment agreement. The arbitration agreement was procedurally unconscionable as it was an adhesion contract, the employee was urged to sign it quickly and under economic pressure as doing so was a condition of continued employment. The arbitration agreement contained several substantively unconscionable provisions: It shortened the limitations period to 3 months, did not grant a right to any discovery (leaving all discovery to the arbitrator’s discretion), imposed some arbitration costs on the employee, making them unrecoverable even if the employee prevailed, all of which unreasonably favored the employer.