This decision reverses a summary judgment for Google in a class action claiming that Google improperly used browsing history and other personal data when Google’s privacy policy and disclosures to its users could be understood by a reasonable user to mean that Google would use that data only if the user subscribed to Google’s “sync” product. The district court improperly based its decision on the fact that Google scraped the same data from users of other internet browsers rather than determining if a reasonable user might read Google’s policy and disclosure to promise it wouldn’t use that data from customers who used the Google browser without subscribing to “sync.”