(Joining the chorus of decisions criticizing and departing from Felisilda v. FCA US LLC (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 486, review granted, this decision holds that the car manufacturer and authorized repair center are not third party beneficiaries of the arbitration clause in the auto dealer’s conditional sale contract with the plaintiff car buyer. Hence, the trial court erred in compelling arbitration of the car buyer’s Song Beverly Act claims against the manufacturer and repair center. The arbitration clause stated only that the dealer and car buyer could elect arbitration and confined the claims subject to arbitration to disputes between those two parties. The car buyer is not equitably estopped either because a manufacturer’s warranty arises independently of the conditional sales contract between dealer and buyer.)