(The trial court abused its discretion in granting Kaiser summary judgment based on the judicial abstention doctrine. Here, a district attorney brought suit against Kaiser under the UCL and FAL for violating Health & Safety Code 1367.27 by failing to update its provider directory to remove providers who were no longer accepting new patients or no longer had contracts with Kaiser. The standards set by section 1367.27 were certain enough for a court to enforce. Doing so under the UCL and FAL would not interfere with the administrative agency that regulates health insurance plans or involve the court in any complex economic questions. The requested injunctive relief could be administered sufficiently easily by the court.)