(An appeal from a domestic violence prevention order is not rendered moot by the expiration of the order because under Family Law 3044, for five years after entry of the order, it is presumed that the defendant found to have committed the domestic violence is not a proper person to be given custody of a child. The trial court in this case violated the defendant’s due process rights by interviewing the couple’s child outside the parents’/parties’ presence and without taking any measure to inform the parents/parties about what the child said during the in chambers interview, either by a reporter’s transcript, counsel’s summary, or court’s summary of the testimony.)