California Appellate Tracker

Castillo v. Glenair, Inc.

April 30, 2018

Judgment in earlier wage & hour class action that employees filed against their staffing company employer barred later suit on the same claims by same employees against the firm where they worked since that firm was the staffing company’s agent with respect to payroll matters.

Employees of a staffing company brought a class action suit against that company for various wage and hour violations. Before that suit was resolved, the staffing company’s employees who worked at Glenair sued it for the same wage and hour violations. The suit against the staffing company settled and was dismissed. The settlement released claims against the staffing company and its “agents.” This decision affirms a summary judgment in Glenair’s favor on both res judicata grounds and on the release. As to res judicata, the judgment dismissing the case against the staffing company was final. Both suits alleged the same claims. As a joint employer, jointly and severally liable for wage and hour compliance, Glenair was in privity with the staffing company and so could invoke res judicata in its favor. Also, because Glenair acted on behalf of the staffing company and under its direction in tracking the working hours of the joint employees, Glenair was the staffing company’s agent in that regard and thus was released by the release given in the settlement of the suit against the staffing company.

California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2 (Lui, P.J.); 2018 WL 1790683

Subscribe to California Appellate Tracker

Thank you for your desire to subscribe to Severson & Werson’s Appellate Tracker Weblog. In order to subscribe, you must provide a valid name and e-mail address. This too will be retained on our server. When you push the “subscribe button”, we will send an electronic mail to the address that you provided asking you to confirm your subscription to our Weblog. By pushing the “subscribe button”, you represent and warrant that you are over the age of 18 years old, are the owner/authorized user of that e-mail address, and are entitled to receive e-mails at that address. Our weblog will retain your name and e-mail address on its server, or the server of its web host. However, we won’t share any of this information with anyone except the Firm’s employees and contractors, except under certain extraordinary circumstances described on our Privacy Policy and (About The Consumer Finance Blog/About the Appellate Tracker Weblog) Page. NOTICE AND AGREEMENT REGARDING E-MAILS AND CALLS/TEXT MESSAGES TO LAND-LINE AND WIRELESS TELEPHONES: By providing your contact information and confirming your subscription in response to the initial e-mail that we send you, you agree to receive e-mail messages from Severson & Werson from time-to-time and understand and agree that such messages are or may be sent by means of automated dialing technology. If you have your email forwarded to other electronic media, including text messages and cellular telephone by way of VoIP, internet, social media, or otherwise, you agree to receive my messages in that way. This may result in charges to you. Your agreement and consent also extend to any other agents, affiliates, or entities to whom our communications are forwarded. You agree that you will notify Severson & Werson in writing if you revoke this agreement and that your revocation will not be effective until you notify Severson & Werson in writing. You understand and agree that you will afford Severson & Werson a reasonable time to unsubscribe you from the website, that the ability to do so depends on Severson & Werson’s press of business and access to the weblog, and that you may still receive one or more emails or communications from weblog until we are able to unsubscribe you.

I Agree

Effective, Experienced, Exceptional.

California Appellate Tracker

Castillo v. Glenair, Inc.

Categories

San Francisco

Severson & Werson

Orange County

Severson & Werson