The district court correctly denied the defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. The arbitration agreement was part of the terms of use provisions of the defendant’s website through which plaintiff joined defendant’s gym subscription service. However, the website’s enrollment pages did not require the subscriber to view the terms of use or affirmatively agree to be bound by them. The first two pages did not give conspicuous notice of the terms of use. Other, later pages may have done so, but none required unambiguous consent to the terms of use. Plaintiff’s general use of the website didn’t manifest her consent to the terms of use either.