Disagreeing with Miranda v. National Emergency Services, Inc. (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 894, this decision holds that H&S Code 1799.110’s stricter qualifications requirement for expert witnesses apply when the physician being sued was an on-call radiologist who remotely reviewed X-ray and ultrasound images for an emergency department patient on a “stat” basis as requested by the emergency department. Only by extending 1799.110’s protections to such radiologists will the statute’s purpose of encouraging provision of emergency room medical services be furthered. However, it reverses a summary judgment because it finds the defendant’s expert as well as the plaintiff’s expert failed to satisfy 1799.110’s requirements. The defendant’s expert did not specify his professional experience working under emergency conditions, identify the unique challenges facing a radiologist serving the emergency department, or key his opinion to the standard of care applicable under emergency circumstances specifically. While he said he examined imaging for patients in the Emergency Room, he didn’t say that those patients were awaiting emergency medical services.