The district court properly granted defendant’s Anti-SLAPP motion. Anti-SLAPP motions do not conflict with federal procedure and so may properly be brought in federal court on diversity claims governed by California law. Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Ins. Co. (2010) 559 U.S. 393 did not overrule or undermine prior 9th Circuit authority so holding. Plaintiff could not show a reasonable probability of success on its express and implied defamation claims. It could not prove the express statement that it was connected with family separation of illegal immigrants at the border. Its evidence that it did not incarcerate any children its private prison facilities didn’t disprove the statement that it was connected with family separations. Defendants’ statements that plaintiff was at the heart of the controversy over the separation of families illegally crossing the border and was profiting off the pain and separation of families did not reasonably imply that plaintiff ran prisons in which children were incarcerated.