This decision reverses a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff disinherited son and grandchildren of the client who hired the defendant lawyer to draft his will. It holds that the plaintiffs cannot prevail because there was no “clear, certain and undisputed evidence” of the decedent’s intent to benefit the plaintiffs by leaving some of his estate to them. Instead, the evidence showed he intended to disinherit them and leave it up to his wife to assure distribution of his property after his death as he distrusted his son. It is not malpractice to follow the directions of the client in writing a will that distributes his property as he desires.