Writ of mandate issued to quash service of summons on foreign battery manufacturer, LG. LG had availed itself of a California forum through its regular sales to three electric car manufacturers of the same type of battery that plaintiff claimed injured him. However, plaintiff failed to show that defendant’s sales to the car manufacturers were related in any way to his claim of injury from such a battery he purchased as a separate item from a vaping store. The battery manufacturer showed that it never sold its batteries to distributors or retailers of consumer products and that it tried to prevent sale of its batteries to anyone who was not going to use the batteries solely in a battery pack containing necessary safety gear. While the plaintiff needn’t show a causal connection between the manufacturer’s in-California sales and his injury, he still needed to show that the manufacturer’s in-California contacts were related to his claims, and here plaintiff hadn’t made that showing.