This decision affirms an order disqualifying plaintiff’s attorney in a case arising from a dispute among the three principals of a closely held corporation. Plaintiff sued the other two principals as one of those defendants’ wives. Using the corporation’s computers, plaintiff accessed emails the wife sent her husband over the corporation’s email server. The decision holds that the trial court correctly determined that the wife reasonably expected that the communications would be kept confidential and subject to the spousal communication privilege. While plaintiff’s counsel might not be disqualified if plaintiff merely told him about these privileged communications, plaintiff’s attorney was properly disqualified because he used the privileged communications in an attempt to obtain a receiver for the corporation in parallel litigation.