Hassell v. Bird
The federal Communications Decency Act barred the trial court from directing Yelp! to remove libelous content from a review posted by a third party. Read More
The federal Communications Decency Act barred the trial court from directing Yelp! to remove libelous content from a review posted by a third party. Read More
At trial, the court must give a party it has granted in forma pauperis status a free court reporter or other means of obtaining a verbatim transcript. Read More
Claims for prenatal injuries to a baby caused by the mother’s exposure to toxic chemicals are governed by the two-year statute of limitations for personal injuries from exposure to toxic chemicals, which includes tolling provisions for minors and for delayed discovery. Read More
A statute cannot be proactively invalidated on the ground that compliance with it is impossible, although noncompliance can be excused on impossibility grounds. Read More
The integration clause in a residential care facility’s contract did not supersede an arbitration agreement that the resident later signed; on remand, the trial court must consider plaintiffs’ other defenses to arbitration. Read More
A state law requiring public employees who are non-union members to pay agency fees to the union that is the certified bargaining agent for employees in their work unit violates the First Amendment by compelling the employees to fund speech with which they may not agree. Read More
American Express’s anti-steering policy, which forbids merchants from suggesting to customers, at the point of sale, that they use a non-Amex credit card that charges lower merchant fees, does not violate the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. Read More
A collection attorney engages in debt collection for purposes of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act when he pursues judicial foreclosure because that proceeding allows for the collection of a deficiency judgment—unlike a nonjudicial foreclosure, the sole goal of which is to retake property given as security. Read More
Securitized mortgages that Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae held in trust for investors are considered the property of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, so HOAs cannot obtain a super-priority lien for unpaid dues that will take precedence over the mortgage loan. Read More
Attorney fees in Americans with Disabilities Act litigation are to be calculated using the lodestar method. Read More
An employer may use a time clock that averages to the nearest quarter hour, so long as the employer can show that the rounding policy, over time, results in overcompensation of workers as a whole (even if the employer cannot show that the policy does not undercompensate any particular worker). Read More
When an appeals court affirms a trial court’s ruling on only one ground, that is only the ground that can be given claim preclusive or issue preclusive effect in subsequent litigation. Read More
The defendant store was properly awarded summary judgment in a slip-and-fall lawsuit when the plaintiff presented no evidence to show that there was anything on the floor or that it was wet or slippery. Read More
A court may not sanction a party for filing an improper reconsideration motion without first giving the party 21-days notice and opportunity to withdraw the offending motion. Read More
Probate court lacks jurisdiction to determine who is entitled to the proceeds of decedent’s life insurance policy since the proceeds are not a property of the decedent’s estate. Read More
Plaintiff employee was not barred from testifying about her memory of the content of sexually suggestive emails defendant co-worker sent her since the emails themselves had been lost. Read More
Administrative law judge’s decision finding cause for community college employee’s termination collaterally estopped employee’s later suit for discrimination, insofar as that suit sought to challenge ALJ’s finding that employer had a non-discriminatory reason for the termination. Read More
A patentee may recover lost profits suffered in foreign countries as damages in a patent infringement action brought against a defendant that shipped parts from the United States for assembly into an infringing product in a foreign country. Read More
Under the Commerce Clause, the states’ power to impose sales taxes on sellers is limited only by the requirement of a substantial nexus to the taxing state; the seller’s physical presence in the state is no longer required for the imposition of sales tax. Read More