Skip to Content (Press Enter)

Skip to Nav (Press Enter)

California Appellate Tracker

The following summaries are of recent published decisions of the California appellate courts, the Ninth Circuit, and the United States Supreme Court. The summaries are presented without regard to whether Severson & Werson represented a party in the case.

Subscribe to California Appellate Tracker

Thank you for your desire to subscribe to Severson & Werson’s Appellate Tracker Weblog. In order to subscribe, you must provide a valid name and e-mail address. This too will be retained on our server. When you push the “subscribe button”, we will send an electronic mail to the address that you provided asking you to confirm your subscription to our Weblog. By pushing the “subscribe button”, you represent and warrant that you are over the age of 18 years old, are the owner/authorized user of that e-mail address, and are entitled to receive e-mails at that address. Our weblog will retain your name and e-mail address on its server, or the server of its web host. However, we won’t share any of this information with anyone except the Firm’s employees and contractors, except under certain extraordinary circumstances described on our Privacy Policy and (About The Consumer Finance Blog/About the Appellate Tracker Weblog) Page. NOTICE AND AGREEMENT REGARDING E-MAILS AND CALLS/TEXT MESSAGES TO LAND-LINE AND WIRELESS TELEPHONES: By providing your contact information and confirming your subscription in response to the initial e-mail that we send you, you agree to receive e-mail messages from Severson & Werson from time-to-time and understand and agree that such messages are or may be sent by means of automated dialing technology. If you have your email forwarded to other electronic media, including text messages and cellular telephone by way of VoIP, internet, social media, or otherwise, you agree to receive my messages in that way. This may result in charges to you. Your agreement and consent also extend to any other agents, affiliates, or entities to whom our communications are forwarded. You agree that you will notify Severson & Werson in writing if you revoke this agreement and that your revocation will not be effective until you notify Severson & Werson in writing. You understand and agree that you will afford Severson & Werson a reasonable time to unsubscribe you from the website, that the ability to do so depends on Severson & Werson’s press of business and access to the weblog, and that you may still receive one or more emails or communications from weblog until we are able to unsubscribe you.

Judgment, Enforcement, Renewal, Family Law Judgment, Attorney Fee Award, 1, 10 Generally, a civil judgment may not be enforced more than ten years after its entry unless it has been renewed.  However, that rule does not apply to judgments entered in proceedings under the Family Code.  (Fam. Code 921.)  This decision holds that an attorney fee award entered as part… Read More

This decision affirms denial of an employer's arbitration agreement.  The arbitration agreement was procedurally unconscionable to a moderate degree because the agreement was adhesive, the circumstances under which Reddaway required Ronderos to sign the agreement involved significant oppression, and the arbitration agreement involved some surprise because the cost-splitting provision is substantively opaque.  The panel also held that two of the… Read More

Kroger was not a third party beneficiary of Instacart's arbitration agreement.  Instacart's agreement's only mention of retailers from which Instacart delivered goods per the customer's order was to state that Instacart was not liable for any wrongdoing by such a retailer.  Neither Instacart nor its users had any interest in shielding a retailer from court litigation. Read More

This decision holds that a non-competition clause in a contract for the sale of a part of an LLC member's interest in the LLC is not per se illegal but should, instead, be judged by the reasonableness standard.  A sale of a partial business interest differs drastically from the sale of an entire business interest. Following a partial sale, the… Read More

In a case similar to Lara v. First National Ins. Co. of America (9th Cir. 2022) 25 F.4th 1134 and also involving valuation of totaled cars under Washington law, the Ninth Circuit held that the district court should have certified a class on the claim that State Farm improperly deducted a negotiation discount meant to capture the typical amount buyers… Read More

The trial court erred in granting summary judgment against a Cal. professor's claim that the University violated his rights under the Information Practices Act (Civ. Code 1798, et seq.) by publicly disclosing personal information about the professor at a public meeting and by leaking a letter to the press which also disclosed personal information about the professor. Unlike the constitutional… Read More

Because the Song-Beverly Act makes unenforceable any contract provision that waives rights the Act gives consumers, if a manufacturer moves to transfer venue of a Song-Beverly Act claim to a court in another state under a forum selection clause, the manufacturer bears the burden of proving that litigating in a different forum will not diminish the plaintiff’s unwaivable rights. Here,… Read More

(After suing Coinbase for damages and having that case sent to arbitration, plaintiff filed this separate suit under the CLRA, UCL and FAL seeking only an injunction to prevent Coinbase from falsely advertising that its security features.  This decision follows Mejia v. DACM, Inc. (2020) 54 Cal.App.5th 691 and other decisions in holding that a suit seeking an injunction benefitting… Read More

Enmark v. KC Community Care, LLC (2024) 2024 WL 4290290 (A Lanterman-Petris-Short Act conservator for a mentally ill person does not have actual or ostensible authority to sign an arbitration agreement for the mentally ill person as part of his authorized placement of the conservatee in a mental health facility.  Hence, plaintiffs were not bound to arbitrate the conservatee's survival… Read More

(Defendant employer waived its right to compel arbitration.  Its claim to have suddenly discovered the employee's arbitration agreement five months after the suit was filed was not credible as no explanation was given why the employee's personnel file containing the arbitration agreement was not available earlier.  In addition, the employer agreed to mediate the case on a class action basis… Read More

(This opinion affirms a trial court's denial of plaintiff's attorney's seventh request for a continuance as an accommodation of his manic-depression mental illness.  Under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 1.100(f), a court may deny a request for one of three reasons:  the applicant has not satisfied the rule's requirements or the requested accommodation would create an undue financial or administrative… Read More

(This opinion affirms a trial court's denial of plaintiff's attorney's seventh request for a continuance as an accommodation of his manic-depression mental illness.  Under Cal. Rules of Court, rule 1.100(f), a court may deny a request for one of three reasons:  the applicant has not satisfied the rule's requirements or the requested accommodation would create an undue financial or administrative… Read More

Appeals, Recalling the Mandate or Remittitur, Extraordinary Circumstances Required, 2, 12 In a brief order, the Ninth Circuit denies the parties' joint application for it to recall its remittitur so that the district court will not proceed with the case on remand while the defendant petitions the US Supreme Court for certiorari.  Recalling the mandate is a last resort remedy… Read More

This decision holds that the trial court erred in not compelling arbitration in this wage-and-hour case.  The employment contract Gonzalez had with his direct employer, Nowhere, contained an enforceable arbitration clause.  Gonzalez also sued, on the same claims, nine other entities which could be liable only if they were his joint employers.  Since the liability of the nine alleged joint… Read More

Insurance, Exclusions, Sexual Molestation, "Care, Custody, or Control", 1, 12 Gordon sued the owner and operator of a massage parlor for sexually molesting her while giving her a massage.  This decision holds that the massage parlor's insurer owed no duty to defend  or indemnify with respect to the claim due to a sexual molestation exclusion in the policy.  The exclusion… Read More

Summary judgment was properly entered against plaintiff who tried to hold Farmers vicariously liable for its agent's underestimate the replacement cost of plaintiff's house and thus ordered inadequate fire insurance from California FAIR Plan.  Farmers' contract with the agent allowed the agent to write insurance on Farmers but not on the FAIR Plan.  And Farmers had not engaged in any… Read More

Under Com. Code 2305(2), a party that has the discretionary power to set the price of goods under the parties' contract must set that price in good faith.  Section 2305 defines good faith as the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in the trade, and .includes a “safe harbor” provision, providing that “in the normal case a posted… Read More

1 2 3 4 5 189