California Appellate Tracker

An order compelling arbitration is not a final judgment entitled to res judicata or collateral estoppel effect because it cannot be appealed until after judgment is entered confirming the arbitration award. Read More

If a respondent fails to file a notice of defense to an accusation by the ABC Bd., it may act based on its own evidence.  However, the ALJ has discretion to hold an evidentiary hearing even if no notice of defense is filed, and the board may vacate a decision if a motion requesting relief for inadvertence, surprise or excusable… Read More

A taxpayer may not pursue a court action for a refund of property taxes without first applying to the local board of equalization for a reduction and then filing an administrative claim for a refund. (Rev. and Tax. Code, §§ 1603, 5097; see Steinhart v. County of Los Angeles (2010) 47 Cal.4th 1298.)  Here, plaintiffs sought to bring a class… Read More

In a case involving interstate commerce, the FAA governs and the federal standard for waiver as interpreted in Morgan v. Sundance, Inc. (2022) 142 S.Ct. 1708 applies.  Here, the trial court properly denied arbitration since the defendant waited 17 months from the filing of the complaint before moving to compel arbitration.  During that time plaintiff attempted to take discovery.  Defendant… Read More

A 998 offer automatically expire when a trial court orally grants the offeror’s summary judgment motion.  The offer cannot be accepted after the oral ruling. Read More

The trial court correctly denied defendants' claim for enhanced costs under CCP 998.  Their offer was invalid because it required a general release of all claims, including claims not sued upon. Read More

The trial court properly denied plaintiff attorney fees under CCP 1021.5 when it obtained a preliminary injunction requiring Prop. 65 warnings on coffee but later lost on summary judgment.  The temporary warnings did not confer any substantial benefit on the general public.  The Coffee Regulation later adopted by the agency responsible for Prop. 65 showed that coffee poses no significant… Read More

During this litigation about whether Prop. 65 requires warnings about the carcinogen acrylamide in coffee, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment issued a legislative regulation stating that chemicals known to be included in coffee created by the process of roasting or brewing coffee do not pose a significant risk of cancer.  (27 CCR 25704.)  The trial court correctly granted… Read More

The economic loss rule does not bar a claim for fraudulent inducement to buy a car.  Plaintiffs here alleged that Nissan fraudulently induced them to buy a Nissan Sentra by intentionally concealing facts about its defective transmission which caused dangerous gaps in power to the wheels.  Under the reasoning of Robinson Helicopter Co. v. Dana Corp. (2004) 34 Cal.4th 979,… Read More

Plaintiff was injured in an accident on his Yamaha dirt bike.  He said the authorized Yamaha dealer from whom he bought the bike had installed the throttle mechanism improperly, leading it to fall off the bike, causing the accident.  The jury verdict and judgment in favor of Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., the US distributor of the bike was reversed because… Read More

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to apply the merger doctrine to void a driveway easement which was the only means of access to the plaintiff's property.  Defendant had owned both adjoining parcels at one point, but had promptly taken out a loan on the property benefited by the easement--a loan that probably wouldn't have been… Read More

While a valid 998 offer may contain a demand for release of the claims sued upon, this 998 offer included a demand for a settlement agreement that was not attached to the 998 offer or described in detail (only some of its potential terms were mentioned) in the 998 offer.  Hence, the trial court correctly concluded that the offer was… Read More

A school district is not a “person” who is in a “business, service, or professional relationship” with its students and so is not liable under Civ. Code 51.9 for sexual harassment of a student by a teacher. Read More

Under CCP 340.1(b), a plaintiff may obtain treble damages against a person whose cover up is found to be the cause of a sexual assault on a child through a concerted effort to hide evidence relating to childhood sexual assault.  This decision holds that the treble damage provision does not apply retroactively.  The statute espressly makes the lengthened statute of… Read More

Disagreeing with Niedermeier v. FCA US LLC (2020) 56 Cal.App.5th 1052, this decision holds that a car manufacturer may not offset the consumer's "profits" on resale or trade-in of a lemon car against the restitution amounts otherwise recoverable by a consumer as a result of the manufacturer's violation of the Song-Beverly Act.  To allow an offset would contradict the clear… Read More

Though not limited by US Const. Art. III case or controversy standing requirements, California court apply prudential standing requirements.  Absent a statutory grant of standing to represent the general public, a plaintiff must generally show that he has a beneficial interest in the claim he pursues.  A statute like FCRA that allows for statutory damages that are intended to compensate… Read More

This decision holds that at least when the employer can and does capture time worked to the exact minute, it cannot justify not paying an employee for every minute worked by relying on a facially neutral policy of rounding time to the nearest 15 minutes.  California law requires payment of employees for all time worked, and disallows any de minimus… Read More

This decision distinguishes United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co. (2018) 4 Cal.5th 1082 which held that a prime contractor violated a prompt payment statute (CC 8818) when it withheld payment of an undisputed progress payment to a subcontractor over a dispute about the subcontractor's additional claim for add-ons and change orders.  In this case, the… Read More

Plaintiff employees acted as customer service representatives who spoke with customers by telephone operated through employer-supplied computers.  This decision holds that time spent turning the computers on and booting them up was an indispensable part of the employees' principal duties and therefore was compensable work time under the FLSA, as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act.  It remands the case to… Read More

Affirming an attorney fee award of $10,000 instead of the requested $34,000 in a simple ADA case, this decision holds that the district court judge adequately explained why he used a blended hourly rate and reduced hours by 65%, finding that the case was simple, most of the work could have been done by junior attorneys or paralegals, and much… Read More