California Appellate Tracker

Sanjiv Goel M.D., Inc. v. Regal Medical Group, Inc.

June 14, 2017

In determining the reasonable value of medical services a doctor provided to patients covered by a medical plan with which the doctor had no contract setting fees, the trial court properly considered evidence of what other doctors charged and the Medicare reimbursement rate for the services rendered.

In determining the reasonable value of medical services provided by a doctor (or a medical group) to patients covered by a medical plan with which the treating doctor has no contract setting fees, the trial court may properly consider not only (a) the fees the treating doctor usually charges for the same services and (b) the fees the treating doctor is normally paid for those services (the issue decided in Children’s Hospital Central California v. Blue Cross of California (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 1260) but also (c) the amount charged by other doctors for the same services, and (d) the amount paid by Medicare for those services. Here, the trial court properly considered all four of these types of evidence and reached a conclusion as to the reasonable value of the doctor’s services that was supported by substantial evidence.

California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1 (Lui, J.); May 23, 2017; 2017 WL 2242981

Subscribe to California Appellate Tracker

Thank you for your desire to subscribe to Severson & Werson’s Appellate Tracker Weblog. In order to subscribe, you must provide a valid name and e-mail address. This too will be retained on our server. When you push the “subscribe button”, we will send an electronic mail to the address that you provided asking you to confirm your subscription to our Weblog. By pushing the “subscribe button”, you represent and warrant that you are over the age of 18 years old, are the owner/authorized user of that e-mail address, and are entitled to receive e-mails at that address. Our weblog will retain your name and e-mail address on its server, or the server of its web host. However, we won’t share any of this information with anyone except the Firm’s employees and contractors, except under certain extraordinary circumstances described on our Privacy Policy and (About The Consumer Finance Blog/About the Appellate Tracker Weblog) Page. NOTICE AND AGREEMENT REGARDING E-MAILS AND CALLS/TEXT MESSAGES TO LAND-LINE AND WIRELESS TELEPHONES: By providing your contact information and confirming your subscription in response to the initial e-mail that we send you, you agree to receive e-mail messages from Severson & Werson from time-to-time and understand and agree that such messages are or may be sent by means of automated dialing technology. If you have your email forwarded to other electronic media, including text messages and cellular telephone by way of VoIP, internet, social media, or otherwise, you agree to receive my messages in that way. This may result in charges to you. Your agreement and consent also extend to any other agents, affiliates, or entities to whom our communications are forwarded. You agree that you will notify Severson & Werson in writing if you revoke this agreement and that your revocation will not be effective until you notify Severson & Werson in writing. You understand and agree that you will afford Severson & Werson a reasonable time to unsubscribe you from the website, that the ability to do so depends on Severson & Werson’s press of business and access to the weblog, and that you may still receive one or more emails or communications from weblog until we are able to unsubscribe you.

I Agree

Effective, Experienced, Exceptional.

California Appellate Tracker

Sanjiv Goel M.D., Inc. v. Regal Medical Group, Inc.

Categories

San Francisco

Severson & Werson

Orange County

Severson & Werson