In Mey v. Medguard Alert, No. 5:19-CV-315, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80083, at *13-14 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 27, 2021), Judge Tates found that the SCOTUS’ holding in Barr didn’t render the TCPA unconstitutional for non-government backed debts.
Those courts which have found the TCPA to be valid with regard to non-Government debt calls, even in light of Barr,include McCurley, supra; Less v. Quest Diagnostics Inc., 2021 WL 266548(N.D. Ohio Jan. 26, 2021); Stoutt v. Travis Credit Union, 2021 WL 99636 (E.D. Cal.Jan. 12, 2021); Rieker v. Nat’L Car Cure, LLC, 2021 WL 210841 (ND. Fla. Jan. 5, 2021); Trujillo v. FreeEnergy Say. Co., LLC, 2020 WL 8184336 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2020); Shen v. Tricolor California Auto Group, LLC, 2020 WL 7705888 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2020); Abramson v. Federal Ins. Co., 2020 WL 7318953 (M.D. FIa. Dec. 11, 2020), Buchanan v. Sullivan, 2020 WL 6381 563 (D. Neb. Oct. 30, 2020); Schmitt v. AmerAssistAIR Solutions Inc., 2020 WL 6135181 (D. Ariz. Oct. 19, 2020); Canady v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corp., 2020 WL 5249263(D. Adz. Sept. 3, 2020); Komaiko v. Baker Techs., Inc., 2020 WL 5104041 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2020); and Burton v. Fundmerica, Inc., 2020 WL 4504303 (0. Neb. Aug. 5, 2020). For all the reasons stated above, this Court finds that the TCPA, except for the 2015 amendment, remains and remained in full force and effect throughout its tenure. Mey v. John Doe Defendant let al, Civ. A. No. 5:1 9-CV-237 [Doc. 126 at 20-271, (N.D. W.Va. April 23, 2021) (Bailey, J.). This Court finds no reason to deviate from the above analysis.