Default establishes defendants’ liability for the TCPA violations alleged in Cunningham’s complaint, so the analysis must next turn to damages. The TCPA allows for $500 in damages for each violation of certain statutory provisions. Cunningham indicated in an affidavit that he received 176 phone calls from defendants and that those phone calls violated § 227(b) and 227(c)(5) of the TCPA, as well as three regulations prescribed under § 227(c), 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(b)(1), (b)(2), and (d). Those few courts to have considered the question have determined that a plaintiff may recover multiple statutory damages awards per phone call when the phone call violates multiple statutory provisions of the TCPA, but a plaintiff may only recover one statutory damages award per phone call even if the phone call violates multiple regulations prescribed under § 227(c). See Drew v. Lexington Consumer Advocacy, LLC, No. 16-cv-200, 2016 WL 1559717, at *12 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2016). Under this framework, Cunningham may recover $1,000 per phone call because each phone call violated two statutory provisions of the TCPA.
In Cunningham v. Tollfreezone.com, No. 16-cv-761-jdp2017, WL 3055506 (D.Wis. July 18, 2017), Judge Peterson said how to calculate TCPA damages where each call violates multiple statutory provisions of the TCPA.